Upfront
Mini Bytes
Welcome
to the sixth edition of our bi-weekly feature Upfront Mini Bytes. In Upfront Mini Bytes we will provide eight
tasty bits of genealogy news that will help give you a deeper byte into your
family history research. Each item is short and sweet. We encourage you
to check out the links to articles, blog posts, resources, and anything
genealogical!
We hope you found
the past editions helpful:
Do you have
questions, suggestions for future posts, or comments? Please post a comment or send an e-mail to [email protected].
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
source: http://public.health.oregon.gov/BirthDeathCertificates/GetVitalRecords/PublishingImages/images/fs-cert-face.jpg |
Doing research for
ancestors from Oregon ? If so, be aware that the legislature is looking
to making vital records access rules even more stringent. Both Dick Eastman and The Legal
Genealogist have written on this topic. Additionally, there continue to be
efforts to limit access to the Master Death File, White House to propose restrictions
on Master Death File to fight tax fraud.
[caption for image –
source: http://public.health.oregon.gov/BirthDeathCertificates/GetVitalRecords/PublishingImages/images/fs-cert-face.jpg ]
Newry ME and nearby
communities are fortunate to have a citizen like Mark Vale. A recent article in
The Bethel Citizen, Family genealogy turns into town
history project, talks about an incredible one-man project of abstracted
records. If you are doing research in this area, do check out this database of over 30,000 names!
Most of the
ancestors that we research will ultimately be remembered as names in documents. Many of us won’t ever find images of our 19th
century ancestors, never mind those deeper in our tree. With the prevalence of affordable cameras, video cameras, and now digital technology, we
are in a position to leave more image-laden records for our descendants to
enjoy. The New York Times discusses this
in the article, Hey, at Least You
Can Be Virtually Immortal.
New databases are
always fun. A recently found one is the Union Civil War
Surgeons Database. Genealogy Decoded
posted an article about this database which you can
access at the Indiana University School of Medicine website.
You think our handwriting
can be difficult to read? I sometimes wonder what the requirements were to be a
court clerk. I have seen some of the
worst handwriting in court records.
Probably the only things harder to read are petitions where the
signatures are all original (great) and yet almost illegible (not so
great). Do you struggle with deciphering
hand-written documents? The UK Archives has Palaeography: reading old
handwriting 1500 – 1800, A practical online
tutorial.
image source: GollyGForce Photostream, http://www.flickr.com/photos/see-through-the-eye-of-g/5827220004/sizes/l/in/photostream/used under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ |
Are you researching
ancestors from Northern
Ireland ?
If so, Valuation Revision
Books (VAL/12/B) covering counties Antrim, Armagh, Down,
Fermanagh, Londonderry , and Tyrone between the
years 1864 to 1933 are now online at the Public Record Office of Northern
Ireland (PRONI).
image as used with the referenced original article |
We often talk about
social media and the power it has to connect us to distant cousins and also as
a platform to share the information we have and find. Recently an aunt and her adopted niece
connected via Facebook, Facebook post leads
to family discovery [Editor’s
note: the video which originally accompanied the article seems to no longer be
available though the article still is]
Church records are
invaluable! The newest addition to the
Archives.com website is Millions of
Lutheran Church Records from the Evangelical
Lutheran Church
in America Archives.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
copyright © National
Genealogical Society, 3108 Columbia Pike, Suite 300, Arlington, Virginia
22204-4370. http://www.ngsgenealogy.org.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Want to learn more
about interacting with the blog, please read Hyperlinks,
Subscribing and Comments -- How to Interact with Upfront with NGS Blog posts!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NGS does not imply
endorsement of any outside advertiser or other vendors appearing in this blog.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Republication
of UpFront articles is permitted and encouraged for
non-commercial purposes without express permission from NGS. Please drop us a
note telling us where and when you are using the article. Express written
permission is required if you wish to republish UpFront articles
for commercial purposes. You may send a request for express written permission
to [email protected]. All republished articles may not be
edited or reworded and must contain the copyright statement found at the bottom
of each UpFront article.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Think your friends,
colleagues, or fellow genealogy researchers would find this blog post
interesting? If so, please let them know that anyone can read past UpFront with NGS posts or subscribe!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suggestions
for topics for future UpFront with NGS posts are always welcome. Please
send any suggested topics to [email protected]
I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but your blog is now showing up as a partial feed on RSS feeders. That means that anyone who subscribes to your blog (i.e. your most loyal and engaged readers) can't read the full blog post without clicking through. Many of us read on mobile devices, where clicking through isn't a good option. That's one of many reasons partial feeds are so unpopular (google "hate partial RSS feeds" for more information).
ReplyDeleteThis is going to become especially problematic when Google Reader goes away in a few months. The replacement readers out there don't necessarily allow you to click through without issues, so you have to launch a separate browser to do so. As a practical matter, most readers (especially technically challenged ones) won't go through that multi-step process to read your blog post.
I urge you to consider returning to a full feed, so that we can read and enjoy your posts. They're always interesting and informative, and I don't want to miss them.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention; we have heard from a few people posting to various blogs and through direct e-mail. We had issues with feedburner as we used it previously in that though it gave full articles, you didn't know if there was more than one article and many were missing the second one.
ReplyDeleteI think we need to revisit the parameters and see if we can do both full articles + have a way to indicate more than one article.
I will pass your comments to the IT person and we'll see what we can do about this. Definitely don't want to lose any readers and we definitely aren't trying to make it "hard" for the readers we do have to follow the blog!
Appreciate your taking the time to "explain" the issue with clicking and readers -- we weren't aware of that.