|
We at Upfront with NGS are very excited to bring you this four part
series on DNA testing and its genealogical uses ...
If you missed part 1, click here!
Article
courtesy of Roberta Estes, www.dnaexplain.com,
e-mail
Roberta at [email protected]
or [email protected].
Graphics
courtesy of Roberta, Family Tree DNA, www.familytreedna.com and the ISOGG wiki at http://www.isogg.org/wiki/Wiki_Welcome_Page.
What About Mutations?
Another
really good question.
Y-line DNA
testing actually tests either 12, 25, 37, 67 or 111 locations on the Y
chromosome, depending on which test you select.
What is actually reported at these locations is the number of exact
repeats of that segment of DNA.
Occasionally, either a segment is dropped or one is added. This is a normal process and typically
affects nothing. However, for genealogy,
these changes or mutations are wonderful, as the number of segments in a
particular location will typically be the same from generation to generation. These mutations differentiate us and our
families over time. Without mutations,
all of our DNA would look exactly alike and there would be no genetic
genealogy.
For
mitochondrial DNA, you can test at the entry level, the intermediate “plus”
level and at the full sequence level. If
you think of the full sequence level, which tests the entire mitochondria, as a
clock face, the entry level test tests from 5 till the hour to “noon” so from
11AM to 12 on the clock face. The second
intermediate level tests from “noon” to 5 after, or 1PM. The full sequence level tests the entire
clock face. Ultimately, if it’s matches
you’re looking for, you’ll want the full sequence test to provide you with the
best matches and the ones closest to you in time, plus it provides you with
your full haplogroup, or clan, designation.
When a
change, called a mutation, does occur at a particular location, it is then
passed from father to son (or mother to daughter) and on down that line. That mutation, called a “line marker
mutation” is then forever associated with that line of the family. If you test different males with the same
surname, and they match except for only a couple of minor differences, you can
be assured that they do in fact share a common ancestor in a genealogically
relevant timeframe.
A father
can potentially sire several sons, some with no mutations, and others with
different mutations, as shown by the red mutation bar in the following
illustration.
In the
above example, John Patrick Kenney had two sons, one with no mutation and Paul
Edward Kenney who had one mutation. All
of the male descendents of Paul Edward Kenney have his mutation and a second
mutation is added to this line at a new location in the generation above Stan
Kenny.
John
Patrick Kenney’s son who had no mutations sired a son Joseph Kenney, who had a
mutation in yet a different location than either of the mutations in the Paul
Edward Kenney line.
In the span
of time between 1478 and 2004, this grouping of Kenney/Kenny families has
accumulated 4 distinct lines as you can see across the bottom of the diagram,
line 3 with no mutations, line 1 with 2 mutations, and two other lines with
only one mutation each, but those mutations are not in the same location so
they are easily differentiated in descendants testing today. These are called “line marker” mutations and
allow testers to quickly and easily see which line of the Kenny family they
descend from.
What Do the Results Look Like?
Y DNA results
are reported in the following format at Family Tree DNA
where locus means the location number, the DYS# means the name of that marker
location, and the number of alleles means the number of repeats of DNA found in
that location. This is a partial screen
shot from the Family
Tree DNA results page for a participant.
This is
interesting, but the power of DNA testing isn’t in what your numbers alone look
like, but in how they compare with others of similar surnames. So, you’re provided with a list of people
that you match, along with access to their Gedcom file if they have uploaded
one, most distant ancestor information, and most importantly, their e-mail
address by clicking on the little envelope right after their name.
As a DNA
Surname Project Administrator of several projects, I combine the groupings of
participants into logical groupings based on their DNA patterns and their
genealogy. Haplogroup projects are grouped by subgroup and mutations, and
surname projects are grouped by matching family group.
The
following table is an example from my Estes surname project which has very successfully
identified the various sons of the immigrant ancestor, Abraham Estes born in
1647. Based on his descendent lines’
DNA, we have even successfully reconstructed what Abraham’s DNA looked like,
shown in green, through a process called triangulation, so we have a firm basis for comparison, and
everyone is compared to Abraham.
Mutations are highlighted in yellow.
I have
shown only an example of the full chart below.
Moses through John R’s line does have line marker mutations on markers
that are not shown here. Elisha’s line
matches Abraham’s exactly. We have had 4
descendents test from various sons of Elisha and so far we have found no
mutations.
Locus
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
*5
|
*6
|
7
|
8
|
*9
|
10
|
Kit #
|
393
|
390
|
19 (394)
|
391
|
385a
|
385b
|
426
|
388
|
439
|
389-1
|
Abraham
|
13
|
25
|
14
|
12
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
English
Estes Line (Reconstructs Sylvester, Abraham's father)
|
||||||||||
16532
|
13
|
25
|
14
|
12
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
11
|
13
|
Moses through John R Line
|
||||||||||
9993
|
13
|
25
|
14
|
12
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
11375
|
13
|
25
|
14
|
12
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
Poss John thru Elisha and Micajah
line descendents
|
||||||||||
13044
|
13
|
25
|
14
|
12
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
14107
|
13
|
25
|
14
|
11
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
16355
|
14
|
25
|
14
|
11
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
11
|
13
|
Thomas line
|
||||||||||
12088
|
13
|
24
|
14
|
11
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
Sylvester line
|
||||||||||
13805
|
13
|
25
|
14
|
12
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
17420
|
13
|
25
|
14
|
11
|
11
|
15
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
Robert's line thru son George son
Bartlett son John Bacon
|
||||||||||
14220
|
13
|
25
|
14
|
12
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
13
|
Elisha's line (matches Abraham
exactly)
|
||||||||||
12563
|
13
|
25
|
14
|
12
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
19696
|
13
|
25
|
14
|
12
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
Abraham's cousin Richard line -
Northern Estes line
|
||||||||||
12630
|
13
|
25
|
14
|
10
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
14167
|
13
|
24
|
15
|
11
|
11
|
15
|
11
|
13
|
10
|
14
|
This
group helped us reconstruct Abraham’s DNA.
Please notice that participant 14167 either has unsound genealogy or
an unrecorded adoption has occurred.
|
||||||||||
Moses in SC line
|
||||||||||
20835
|
13
|
22
|
14
|
10
|
14
|
14
|
11
|
14
|
11
|
13
|
Note that
this line, even though the last name is Estes, does not match the Abraham
Estes line.
|
||||||||||
Susanna Estes line
|
||||||||||
21235
|
13
|
24
|
14
|
11
|
11
|
15
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
This and
the following group represent illegitimate births where the men took the
mother’s last name of Estes, but their DNA does not match the Estes male
line.
|
||||||||||
Nancy Estes and Jesse Mullins
|
||||||||||
14900
|
13
|
24
|
14
|
11
|
11
|
14
|
13
|
12
|
13
|
13
|
To form a
baseline within a family, we generally test two individuals from two separate lines
of the common ancestor, just in case an undocumented adoption has
occurred. If these two individuals
match, except for minor mutations, then we know basically what the
DNA of your ancestor looks like and others can then test and compare
results against that established line.
If you’re a
female and can’t test for y-line markers, you’re not left out. You’ll need to use traditional genealogy to
find male lineal descendants of your ancestor that carry the family name. Consider offering a scholarship for a
descendent of that line to be tested and then advertise on Rootsweb lists and
boards, on Yahoo groups, on Facebook and anyplace else that you think would be
effective.
Mitochondrial
results look slightly different from Y-line, but the match information is in
essence the same.
Check back tomorrow for Part 3!
Roberta
Estes
www.dna-explained.com (blog)
Copyright 2004-2013, DNAeXplain, all
rights reserved.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Want to
learn more about interacting with the Upfront
with NGS blog, please read Hyperlinks, Subscribing and Comments -- How to Interact with
Upfront with NGS Blog posts!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NGS does not
imply endorsement of any outside advertiser or other vendors appearing in this
blog.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Republication
of UpFront articles is permitted and encouraged for
non-commercial purposes without express permission from NGS. Please drop us a
note telling us where and when you are using the article. Express written
permission is required if you wish to republish UpFront articles
for commercial purposes. You may send a request for express written permission
to [email protected]. All
republished articles may not be edited or reworded and must contain the
copyright statement found at the bottom of each UpFront article.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Think your
friends, colleagues, or fellow genealogy researchers would find this blog post
interesting? If so, please let them know that anyone can read past UpFront with NGS posts or subscribe!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suggestions for topics for future UpFront with NGS
posts are always welcome. Please send any suggested topics to [email protected]
I really enjoyed reading your article of reconstructing Abraham Estes and your illustrative chart showing the various loci of mutations for each of his sons. I am co-administrator for the Kenyon Project. Your article stimulated me to attempt to recreate the Kenyon Most Recent Ancestor in England from the current data we have in the project. Additionally, I set about Recreating John Kenyon, born about 1655, immigrant to America with 7 sons and over 20,000 known descendants and making a similar chart with his sons. It does provide a different perspective of comparing the mutations of each of his sons to the Recreation of John rather than to each other.
ReplyDelete