|Image associated with original blog post|
The census is such an important tool to our research and yet all too often, researchers rely on it maybe a little too much! As with ANY document (even those we consider primary ones) there can be errors! A post by Bill Dollarhide on Leland Meitzler’s GenealogyBlog gives us a sense of some of what can go wrong with a census record.
Dollarhide’s Rule #9: An 1850 census record showing twelve children in a family proves only that your ancestors did not believe in birth control.
Census records provide researchers a primary source of genealogical evidence. The fact that names of people and relationships are listed in certain census schedules is all that is needed to make them our most important sources for finding our ancestors. But, too often, genealogies are prepared just from census records and no other source.
Nevertheless, census records are widely used by genealogists to prepare a record of one’s ancestry. But, census records, unfortunately, are prone to errors. If so, what information can you trust? And, if all you have as evidence of a family is what you have found in a census record, have you really proven anything?
Read the full post for the various ways that census records can be “wrong” or “inconsistent” and what that can mean for your own research.
What are some of the "biggest" or "most humorous" mistakes you have found in a census record? How did you discover them?
copyright © National Ge
nealogical Society, 3108 Columbia
Pike, Suite 300, Arlington, Virginia 22204-4370. http://www.ngsgenealogy.org.
Republication of UpFront articles is permitted and encouraged for non-commercial purposes without express permission from
Please drop us a note telling us where and when you are using the article.
Express written permission is required if you wish to republish UpFront articles
for commercial purposes. You may send a request for express written permission
to [email protected]. All republished articles may not be
edited or reworded and must contain the copyright statement found at the bottom
of each UpFront article.
Think your friends, colleagues, or fellow genealogy researchers would find this blog post interesting? If so, please let them know that anyone can read past UpFront with NGS posts or subscribe!
Suggestions for topics for future UpFront with
posts are always welcome. Please send any suggested topics to [email protected]
The 1870 census in western TN is horrible! Must have been taken by illiterate carpetbaggers [yes I have Confederate ancestors]. Mary A. T. McCulloch Clement and her son Ben Clement are listed as Mary McColler and son Ben. [TN Dyer County, population schedule, 5th Civil District, page 9, dwelling and family 64]. Had she not been living next door to her brothers I would never have found her.ReplyDelete
Mary Clement Douglass
Transcribing & publishing Kansas genealogical records
Have lectures, Will travel!