As a professional genealogist who does a lot of research into African American families in North Carolina, who is often asked to document/prove that there is Native American ancestry mixed into such ancestry (rarely successful), I was very interested to read Henry Louis Gates Jr article “High Cheekbones and Straight Black Hair?” (The Root).
His article is a homage to a 1934 book by Joel A Rogers, “100 Amazing Facts About the Negro With Complete Proof” and “Amazing Fact About the Negro No. 76: What’s the truth behind the legend in many African-American families about having a Native American ancestor?”
The bottom line conclusion by Gates is that “most black people aren’t ‘part Indian,’ despite family lore.” Gates reaches this conclusion based on DNA evidence and states “Bottom line? Those high cheekbones and that straight black hair derive from our high proportion of white ancestors and not, for most of us at least, from our mythical Cherokee great-great grandmother. Sorry, folks, but DNA don’t lie.”
As you can imagine, this article has resulted in over 200 comments (so far) with many of them pointing to other studies which refute some of what Mr. Gates states or personal diatribes against Mr. Gates, etc.
At the same time as I was reading the above article, I came across an older article (2012) on CNN on its INAMERICA page, Pain of 'Trail of Tears' shared by Blacks as well as Native Americans. As the author states, “The iconic tragedy of Indian Removal: the Cherokee Trail of Tears that relocated thousands of Cherokees to Indian Territory (now
was also a Black migration. Slaves of Cherokees walked this trail along with
their Indian owners.” Oklahoma
We know from slavery elsewhere, that whenever you have an enslaved population, you also have children born from interactions between the enslavers and the enslaved. Hence, there can be African American living in
who are part Cherokee. Back in 2005 one
descendant wrote about this topic in “Ancestry in a Drop of Blood,” which discusses DNA testing
and Cherokee ancestry. You can learn
more about this controversy via this Wikipedia page and more about Native American DNA
Projects via Robert Estates and her
DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy webpage.
Back in 2009, the Smithsonian National Museum of African American
History and Culture held a symposium, IndiVisible: African-Native American Lives in the Americas,
which increased the visibility of those who share African American and Native
American Ancestry. Oklahoma
I don’t believe that there is a definitive “answer” to the question of Native American ancestry for African Americans (or for Caucasian Americans). Both of these articles provide some food for thought and remind us that we have to look at the specifics for each individual and family to really figure out each unique story. It may be that your African American ancestors are part Native American and may be not, the same as is true for Caucasian Americans who also have family lore revolving around Native American ancestors.
For me, I will continue to do the following for any clients interested in pursuing Native American ancestors:
1. Research the paper trail. Did ancestors ever self-identify or were they identified as Native American, “yellow” or in some manner designated as not Black/White which could be suggestive of Native American ancestry? Did they live in an area with an identified Native American population at the time in question?
2. Suggest DNA testing. This may have no bearing on tribal membership and it would “possibly” confirm Native American ancestry (only if the relevant DNA has descended to whoever was tested as representative of the family) and possibly suggest about how many generations ago such DNA entered your genes.
What do you think? How much credence to we give to “any” family lore? Are certain types of family lore less reliable than others?
copyright © National Genealogical Society, 3108 Columbia Pike, Suite 300, Arlington, Virginia 22204-4370. http://www.ngsgenealogy.org.
Want to learn more about interacting with the blog, please read Hyperlinks, Subscribing and Comments -- How to Interact with Upfront with NGS Blog posts!
NGS does not imply endorsement of any outside advertiser or other vendors appearing in this blog. Any opinions expressed by guest authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the view of NGS.
Republication of UpFront articles is permitted and encouraged for non-commercial purposes without express permission from NGS. Please drop us a note telling us where and when you are using the article. Express written permission is required if you wish to republish UpFront articles for commercial purposes. You may send a request for express written permission to [email protected]. All republished articles may not be edited or reworded and must contain the copyright statement found at the bottom of each UpFront article.
Think your friends, colleagues, or fellow genealogy researchers would find this blog post interesting? If so, please let them know that anyone can read past UpFront with NGS posts or subscribe!
Suggestions for topics for future UpFront with NGS posts are always welcome. Please send any suggested topics to [email protected]
Unless indicated otherwise or clearly an NGS Public Relations piece, Upfront with NGS posts are written by Diane L Richard, editor, Upfront with NGS.